PRO A12-8870E vs Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.94
+200%

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G outperforms PRO A12-8870E by a whopping 200% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11221957
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.335.16
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)Carrizo (2015−2018)
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)October 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz3.8 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache384 KBno data
L2 cache2 MB2048 KB
L3 cache4 MBno data
Chip lithography12 nm28 nm
Die sizeno data250 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million3,100 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
FRTC-+
FreeSync-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2400
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11AMD Radeon R7 Graphics
iGPU core countno data8
Enduro-n/a
Switchable graphics-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-n/a

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno dataDirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 5.94
+200%
PRO A12-8870E 1.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G 9093
+201%
PRO A12-8870E 3023

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.94 1.98
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G has a 200% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more threads, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

PRO A12-8870E, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G is our recommended choice as it beats the PRO A12-8870E in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G and PRO A12-8870E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G
AMD PRO A12-8870E
PRO A12-8870E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 102 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 7 votes

Rate PRO A12-8870E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 3400G or PRO A12-8870E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.