Celeron 947UE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 866 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 6 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 20 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 34 | no data |
| L1 cache | 576 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 1024 KB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 213 mm2 | 118 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 105 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4800 Million | 1,400 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA1023 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 September 2018 | 20 January 2013 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 has an age advantage of 5 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 83.3% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 947UE, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is a desktop processor while Celeron 947UE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Celeron 947UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
