i5-13400F vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
2018
4 cores / 8 threads, 35 Watt
5.01
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.45
+228%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE by a whopping 228% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1238419
Place by popularitynot in top-10043
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data55.43
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency13.0523.08
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads816
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.6 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache384 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size209.78 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 11no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE 5.01
i5-13400F 16.45
+228%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE 7661
i5-13400F 25180
+229%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.01 16.45
Recency 10 May 2018 4 January 2023
Physical cores 4 10
Threads 8 16
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE has 85.7% lower power consumption.

i5-13400F, on the other hand, has a 228.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and 150% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 167 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 3101 vote

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.