Duron 1400 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1161 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 5.91 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Duron |
| Power efficiency | 7.81 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | K7 (2000−2004) |
| Release date | 12 February 2018 (6 years ago) | 15 August 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266.66 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | 10.5 |
| L1 cache | 128K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 64 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 80.89 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | 37 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 57 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 12 February 2018 | 15 August 2003 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 57 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Duron 1400, on the other hand, has 14% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G and Duron 1400, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
