Celeron 927UE vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1120 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron |
Power efficiency | 8.35 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 35 | no data |
L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Die size | 213 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
Number of transistors | 4800 Million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 29 June 2017 | 1 January 2013 |
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 17 Watt |
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has an age advantage of 4 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron 927UE, on the other hand, has 282.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron 927UE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.