Athlon II X4 640 vs Ryzen 5 PRO 1500

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
5.73
+306%
Athlon II X4 640
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.41

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by a whopping 306% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking11262199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.92
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5no data
Power efficiency8.341.40
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Propus (2009−2011)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads84
Base clock speed3.5 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache96K (per core)128 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2169 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million300 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4AM3
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
AVX+-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 5.73
+306%
Athlon II X4 640 1.41

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 9099
+305%
Athlon II X4 640 2245

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 1146
+266%
Athlon II X4 640 313

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 3696
+289%
Athlon II X4 640 950

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 5.73 1.41
Recency 29 June 2017 11 May 2010
Threads 8 4
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 has a 306.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 640 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II X4 640 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 and Athlon II X4 640, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
Ryzen 5 PRO 1500
AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 43 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 1368 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 PRO 1500 or Athlon II X4 640, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.