Xeon Silver 4208 vs Ryzen 5 8500G

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 8500G
2024
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
14.22
+93.5%

Ryzen 5 8500G outperforms Xeon Silver 4208 by an impressive 93% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking534987
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.71
Market segmentLaptopServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon Silver
Power efficiency19.957.88
Architecture codenamePhoenix2 (2024)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229$417

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1216
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache64 KB (per core)512 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)8 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)11 MB
Chip lithography4 nm14 nm
Die size137 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data78 °C
Number of transistors20,900 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibilityno data+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM5FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt85 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5DDR4-2400
Maximum memory sizeno data1 TB
Max memory channelsno data6
Maximum memory bandwidthno data115.212 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon 740Mno data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208.

PCIe version4.03.0
PCI Express lanes1448

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 8500G 14.22
+93.5%
Xeon Silver 4208 7.35

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 8500G 21756
+93.4%
Xeon Silver 4208 11247

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.22 7.35
Recency 8 January 2024 2 April 2019
Physical cores 6 8
Threads 12 16
Chip lithography 4 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 85 Watt

Ryzen 5 8500G has a 93.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 30.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon Silver 4208, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 8500G is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4208 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook processor while Xeon Silver 4208 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and Xeon Silver 4208, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 8500G
Ryzen 5 8500G
Intel Xeon Silver 4208
Xeon Silver 4208

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 210 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 8500G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4208 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 8500G or Xeon Silver 4208, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.