Celeron M P4500 vs Ryzen 5 8500G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 5 8500G outperforms Celeron M P4500 by a whopping 2086% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 508 | 2717 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | no data | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix2 (2024) | Arrandale (2010−2011) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 1 April 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $86 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 1.86 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 2500 MHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | 81+114 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 90 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20,900 million | 382+177 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
| Socket | AM5 | PGA988 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | no data |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 14 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 13.99 | 0.64 |
| Recency | 8 January 2024 | 1 April 2010 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
| Threads | 12 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8500G has a 2085.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, 200% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M P4500, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 5 8500G is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron M P4500 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron M P4500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
