Ryzen Threadripper 3980X vs Ryzen 5 8500G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 547 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
Series | no data | AMD Ryzen Threadripper |
Power efficiency | 19.93 | no data |
Architecture codename | Phoenix2 (2024) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 14 November 2019 (5 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $229 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 48 (Octatetraconta-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 96 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Multiplier | no data | 32 |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 96K (per core) |
L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 512K (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 128 MB |
Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
Die size | 137 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 20,900 million | 19,200 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM5 | TR4 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR4 Eight-channel |
Maximum memory size | no data | 512 GB |
Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 102.403 GB/s |
ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X.
PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 14 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 8 January 2024 | 14 November 2019 |
Physical cores | 6 | 48 |
Threads | 12 | 96 |
Chip lithography | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 280 Watt |
Ryzen 5 8500G has an age advantage of 4 years, a 75% more advanced lithography process, and 330.8% lower power consumption.
Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, on the other hand, has 700% more physical cores and 700% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook processor while Ryzen Threadripper 3980X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and Ryzen Threadripper 3980X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.