Celeron D 335 vs Ryzen 5 8500G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 489 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Phoenix2 | Prescott (2001−2005) |
| Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | June 2004 (20 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $25 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 5 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 16 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 0 KB |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Die size | 137 mm2 | 109 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
| Number of transistors | 20,900 million | 125 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | no data | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
| VID voltage range | no data | 1.25V-1.4V |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM5 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 73 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | - |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | - |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | - |
| Idle States | no data | - |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | - |
| PAE | no data | 32 Bit |
| FSB parity | no data | - |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | - |
| EDB | no data | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-x | no data | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR5 | DDR1, DDR2 |
| ECC memory support | no data | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 740M | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 14 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 4 nm | 90 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 73 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 8500G is a notebook processor while Celeron D 335 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 8500G and Celeron D 335, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
