Celeron 667 vs Ryzen 5 7530U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 767 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Power efficiency | 63.47 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barcelo-U Refresh (2023) | Timna |
| Release date | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 0.67 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | 32 KB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 128 KB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
| Die size | 180 mm2 | 129 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FP6 | 370S |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | Intel i752 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 12 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 180 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 30 Watt |
Ryzen 5 7530U has 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 2471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 7530U is a notebook processor while Celeron 667 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 7530U and Celeron 667, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
