Athlon Gold 7220C vs Ryzen 5 5500GT
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 597 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 65.59 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | no data | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) |
Power efficiency | 18.50 | no data |
Architecture codename | Cezanne (2021−2024) | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) |
Release date | 8 January 2024 (less than a year ago) | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $125 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 12 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz |
L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB |
L3 cache | 16 MB | 4 MB |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Die size | 180 mm2 | no data |
Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
Number of transistors | 10,700 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | no data |
Socket | AM4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon Vega 7 | AMD Radeon 610M |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 16 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Integrated graphics card | 7.46 | 2.85 |
Recency | 8 January 2024 | 23 May 2023 |
Physical cores | 6 | 2 |
Threads | 12 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 5 5500GT has 161.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 7 months, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.
Athlon Gold 7220C, on the other hand, has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 5500GT is a desktop processor while Athlon Gold 7220C is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 5500GT and Athlon Gold 7220C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.