Xeon D-1587 vs Ryzen 5 3600

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+30.8%
Xeon D-1587
2016
16 cores / 32 threads, 65 Watt
8.54

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon D-1587 by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking693883
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation21.902.06
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Xeon D
Power efficiency16.2612.43
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)24 February 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199$1,443

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 3600 has 963% better value for money than Xeon D-1587.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.6 GHz1.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Multiplierno data17
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256K (per core)
L3 cache32 MB (shared)1.5 MB (per core)
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data306.18 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data80 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million3,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCBGA1667
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
GPIOno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4, DDR3
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s34.124 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587.

PCIe versionno data2.0/3.0
PCI Express lanesno data24
USB revisionno data2.0/3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data6
Number of USB portsno data8
Integrated LANno data+
UARTno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+30.8%
Xeon D-1587 8.54

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600 17747
+30.8%
Xeon D-1587 13566

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.17 8.54
Recency 7 July 2019 24 February 2016
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 7 nm 14 nm

Ryzen 5 3600 has a 30.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon D-1587, on the other hand, has 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon D-1587 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop processor while Xeon D-1587 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and Xeon D-1587, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Xeon D-1587
Xeon D-1587

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17292 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1587 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600 or Xeon D-1587, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.