i7-2840QM vs Ryzen 5 3600

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.60
+362%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Core i7-2840QM by a whopping 362% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking6891760
Place by popularity9not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation23.55no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core i7
Power efficiency16.275.09
Architecture codenameMatisse (2019−2020)Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Release date7 July 2019 (5 years ago)4 September 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 2.0
Bus rateno data4 × 5 GT/s
Multiplierno data24
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache32 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data216 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million1160 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4Socket G2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size128 GB32 GB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/s25.598 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Intel HD Graphics 3000

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3600 11.60
+362%
i7-2840QM 2.51

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 3600 17747
+362%
i7-2840QM 3842

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.60 2.51
Recency 7 July 2019 4 September 2011
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 5 3600 has a 362.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 357.1% more advanced lithography process.

i7-2840QM, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2840QM in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop processor while Core i7-2840QM is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3600 and Core i7-2840QM, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600
Intel Core i7-2840QM
Core i7-2840QM

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 17125 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Core i7-2840QM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3600 or Core i7-2840QM, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.