Celeron M 560 vs Ryzen 5 3500
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 909 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Celeron M |
| Architecture codename | Zen 2 (2017−2020) | Merom (2006−2008) |
| Release date | no data | 1 May 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.13 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 533 MHz |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| L3 cache | 16 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm, 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | no data | 143 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 291 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | PPGA478 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 6 | 1 |
| Threads | 6 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 30 Watt |
Ryzen 5 3500 has 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron M 560, on the other hand, has 116.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 3500 is a desktop processor while Celeron M 560 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron M 560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
