Celeron Dual-Core T3500 vs Ryzen 5 3500

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 3500
6 cores / 6 threads, 65 Watt
8.27
+909%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.82

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by a whopping 909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8612490
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.67no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Celeron Dual-Core
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2019−2020)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release dateno data26 September 2010 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$80
Current price$137 $27 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads62
Base clock speed3.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed4.1 GHz2.1 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache384 KB128 KB
L2 cache3 MB1 MB
L3 cache16 MBno data
Chip lithography7 nm, 12 nm45 nm
Die sizeno data107 mm2
Number of transistorsno data410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4Socket P PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200no data
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.196 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 3500 8.27
+909%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 0.82

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by 909% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 3500 12788
+903%
Celeron Dual-Core T3500 1275

Ryzen 5 3500 outperforms Celeron Dual-Core T3500 by 903% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.27 0.82
Physical cores 6 2
Threads 6 2
Chip lithography 7 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 5 3500 is our recommended choice as it beats the Celeron Dual-Core T3500 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 3500 is a desktop processor while Celeron Dual-Core T3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 3500 and Celeron Dual-Core T3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 3500
Ryzen 5 3500
Intel Celeron Dual-Core T3500
Celeron Dual-Core T3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 704 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 98 votes

Rate Celeron Dual-Core T3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 3500 or Celeron Dual-Core T3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.