Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Ryzen 5 2600H
Aggregate performance score
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core outperforms Ryzen 5 2600H by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1210 | 709 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Apple M-Series |
| Power efficiency | 10.60 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | no data |
| Release date | 10 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 18 October 2021 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.06 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3.22 GHz |
| Multiplier | 32 | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 2.3 MB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 33700 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 2060 ‑ 3220 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 51.196 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.23 | 11.24 |
| Recency | 10 September 2018 | 18 October 2021 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 2060 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600H has 4477.8% lower power consumption.
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has a 114.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 2600H in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600H and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
