Xeon X7560 vs Ryzen 5 2600E
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | not rated | 1205 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | no data |
Power efficiency | no data | 3.72 |
Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | no data |
Release date | 19 September 2018 (6 years ago) | 1 January 2010 (14 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Threads | 12 | 16 |
Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.27 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.67 GHz |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
Multiplier | 31 | no data |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 24 MB L3 Cache |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | FCBGA1567,FCLGA1567 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
AES-NI | + | - |
AVX | + | - |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 1.0 |
Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR3-800, DDR3-978, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, Speed-1066 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Recency | 19 September 2018 | 1 January 2010 |
Physical cores | 6 | 8 |
Threads | 12 | 16 |
Chip lithography | 12 nm | 45 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 130 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2600E has an age advantage of 8 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.
Xeon X7560, on the other hand, has 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 2600E is a desktop processor while Xeon X7560 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon X7560, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.