Athlon MP 2600+ vs Ryzen 5 2500U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1383 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | AMD Athlon MP |
| Power efficiency | 26.02 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Barton (2001−2004) |
| Release date | 26 October 2017 (7 years ago) | 6 May 2003 (21 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $273 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | FSB |
| Bus rate | no data | 266 MT/s |
| Multiplier | 20 | 15 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 101 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | 54 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FP5 | A |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+ are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2400 | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | 4 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 26 October 2017 | 6 May 2003 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 8 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 130 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Ryzen 5 2500U has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 5 2500U is a notebook processor while Athlon MP 2600+ is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2500U and Athlon MP 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
