Celeron M 353 vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | 1074 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.20 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Celeron M |
Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Dothan (2004−2005) |
Release date | 12 February 2018 (6 years ago) | no data |
Launch price (MSRP) | $169 | no data |
Current price | $106 (0.6x MSRP) | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.9 GHz | 0.9 GHz |
Bus support | no data | 400 MHz |
L1 cache | 128K (per core) | no data |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | no data |
L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | - |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | Yes | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
Socket | AM4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | no data |
FMA | + | no data |
AVX | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
Benchmark coverage: 20%
Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Celeron M 353 by 1036% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
Threads | 8 | 1 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 5 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 2400G is a desktop processor while Celeron M 353 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 2400G and Celeron M 353, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.