Xeon W-3275M vs Ryzen 5 1600X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1600X
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 95 Watt
8.45
Xeon W-3275M
2019
28 cores / 56 threads, 205 Watt
25.75
+205%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking846171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.972.52
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Xeon W
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249$7,453
Current price$114 (0.5x MSRP)$9030 (1.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1600X has 494% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)28 (Octacosa-Core)
Threads1256
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.6 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
L1 cache96K (per core)1.75 MB
L2 cache512K (per core)28 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)38.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data76 °C
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSXno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
Statusno dataLaunched

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size64 GB2 TB
Max memory channels26
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes2464

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600X 8.45
Xeon W-3275M 25.75
+205%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600X 13062
Xeon W-3275M 39834
+205%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 205% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600X 1126
Xeon W-3275M 1203
+6.8%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 7% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600X 4750
Xeon W-3275M 11736
+147%

Xeon W-3275M outperforms Ryzen 5 1600X by 147% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.45 25.75
Recency 11 April 2017 3 June 2019
Physical cores 6 28
Threads 12 56
Cost $249 $7453
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 205 Watt

The Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600X in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600X is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600X and Xeon W-3275M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Ryzen 5 1600X
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Xeon W-3275M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 851 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 1600X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 62 votes

Rate Xeon W-3275M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600X or Xeon W-3275M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.