Xeon W-3275M vs Athlon 200GE
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3275M outperforms Athlon 200GE by a whopping 885% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1937 | 262 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 4.27 | 1.77 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Athlon | Intel Xeon W |
| Power efficiency | 2.82 | 4.74 |
| Designer | AMD | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 June 2018 (7 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $55 | $7,453 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Athlon 200GE has 141% better value for money than Xeon W-3275M.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 28 (Octacosa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus type | no data | DMI 3.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 32 | 25 |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 1.75 MB |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 28 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 38.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 76 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Speed Shift | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | no data | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon Vega 3 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 200GE and Xeon W-3275M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.33 | 22.96 |
| Recency | 1 June 2018 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 28 |
| Threads | 4 | 56 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 205 Watt |
Athlon 200GE has 485.7% lower power consumption.
Xeon W-3275M, on the other hand, has a 885.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 1300% more physical cores and 1300% more threads.
The Intel Xeon W-3275M is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 200GE in performance tests.
Note that Athlon 200GE is a desktop processor while Xeon W-3275M is a server/workstation one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
