EPYC 9654 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Ryzen 5 1600
2017
6 cores / 12 threads
7.88
EPYC 9654
2022
96 cores / 192 threads
78.29
+894%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 894% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking8554
Place by popularity60not in top-100
Value for money12.5110.14
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Genoa
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219$11,805
Current price$140 (0.6x MSRP)$4544 (0.4x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 5 1600 has 23% better value for money than EPYC 9654.

Technical specs

Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)96
Threads12192
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size192 mm212x 72 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketAM4SP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size64 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1600 7.88
EPYC 9654 78.29
+894%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 894% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1600 12283
EPYC 9654 122091
+894%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 894% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600 1069
EPYC 9654 1829
+71.1%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 71% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 5 1600 4576
EPYC 9654 18566
+306%

EPYC 9654 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 306% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 7.88 78.29
Recency 11 April 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 6 96
Threads 12 192
Cost $219 $11805
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 360 Watt

The EPYC 9654 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while EPYC 9654 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and EPYC 9654, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
AMD EPYC 9654
EPYC 9654

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5318 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 978 votes

Rate EPYC 9654 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or EPYC 9654, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.