Core 2 Solo SU3500 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking881not rated
Place by popularity52not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation13.35no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Core 2 Solo
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Penryn (2008−2011)
Release date11 April 2017 (7 years ago)1 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219$262
Current price$115 (0.5x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads121
Base clock speed3.2 GHz1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz1.4 GHz
Bus supportno data800 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)3 MB
L3 cache16 MB (shared)3 MB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2107 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4,800 million410 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo
VID voltage rangeno data1.05V-1.15V

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt5.5 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1600 4538
+209%
Core 2 Solo SU3500 1468

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by 209% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1600 8244
+1162%
Core 2 Solo SU3500 654

Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms Core 2 Solo SU3500 by 1162% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 5 1600 6.85
+1539%
Core 2 Solo SU3500 112.25

Core 2 Solo SU3500 outperforms Ryzen 5 1600 by 1539% in wPrime 32.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 April 2017 1 April 2009
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 1
Cost $219 $262
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 5 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Core 2 Solo SU3500 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Core 2 Solo SU3500, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Core 2 Solo SU3500
Core 2 Solo SU3500

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5519 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 8 votes

Rate Core 2 Solo SU3500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Core 2 Solo SU3500, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.