Atom Z550 vs Ryzen 5 1600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking946not rated
Place by popularity44not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.49no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5Intel Atom
Power efficiency11.25no data
Architecture codenameZen 2 (2017−2020)Silverthorne (2008−2010)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)8 April 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$219no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads122
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s533.33 MT/s
Multiplier3215
L1 cache576 KB56 KB (per core)
L2 cache3 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size213 mm226 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistors4800 Million47 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM4PBGA441
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt2.4 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4unknown
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-On certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1600 12279
+3123%
Atom Z550 381

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 5 1600 4538
+591%
Atom Z550 657

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 5 1600 25970
+2550%
Atom Z550 980

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Ryzen 5 1600 6.85
+1382%
Atom Z550 101.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 March 2017 8 April 2009
Physical cores 6 1
Threads 12 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 2 Watt

Ryzen 5 1600 has an age advantage of 7 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

Atom Z550, on the other hand, has 3150% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1600 is a desktop processor while Atom Z550 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1600 and Atom Z550, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1600
Ryzen 5 1600
Intel Atom Z550
Atom Z550

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 5732 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 4 votes

Rate Atom Z550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1600 or Atom Z550, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.