i5-2497M vs Ryzen 5 1500X
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 1122 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.12 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Series | AMD Ryzen 5 | Intel Core i5 |
Power efficiency | 8.34 | no data |
Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
Release date | 11 April 2017 (7 years ago) | no data (2024 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $189 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Bus type | no data | DMI 2.0 |
Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 4 × 5 GT/s |
Multiplier | 35 | 15 |
L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128 KB |
L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 3 MB |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Die size | 192 mm2 | 149 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 624 Million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
Socket | AM4 | no data |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
AES-NI | + | + |
FMA | - | + |
AVX | + | + |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M are enumerated here.
AMD-V | + | - |
VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR3-1333 |
Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | - | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M.
PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
Threads | 8 | 4 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 5 1500X has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.
i5-2497M, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 5 1500X is a desktop processor while Core i5-2497M is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1500X and Core i5-2497M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.