EPYC 7402 vs Ryzen 5 1400

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 5 1400
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
4.88
EPYC 7402
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 180 Watt
28.97
+494%

EPYC 7402 outperforms Ryzen 5 1400 by a whopping 494% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1246156
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.6710.51
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5AMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.1115.23
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date16 March 2017 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169$1,783

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7402 has 294% better value for money than Ryzen 5 1400.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads848
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3.35 GHz
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3228
L1 cache384 KB1.5 MB
L2 cache2 MB12 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die size213 mm2192 mm2
Number of transistors4800 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketAM4TR4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1400 4.88
EPYC 7402 28.97
+494%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 5 1400 7751
EPYC 7402 46012
+494%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 5 1400 961
EPYC 7402 1315
+36.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 5 1400 3126
EPYC 7402 11865
+280%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.88 28.97
Recency 16 March 2017 7 August 2019
Physical cores 4 24
Threads 8 48
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 180 Watt

Ryzen 5 1400 has 176.9% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7402, on the other hand, has a 493.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, 500% more physical cores and 500% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7402 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 5 1400 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 5 1400 is a desktop processor while EPYC 7402 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1400 and EPYC 7402, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1400
Ryzen 5 1400
AMD EPYC 7402
EPYC 7402

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 764 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11 votes

Rate EPYC 7402 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1400 or EPYC 7402, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.