Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs Core 2 Duo E8200

Aggregate performance score

Core 2 Duo E8200
2008
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.71
Xeon E7-8890 v4
2016
24 cores / 48 threads, 165 Watt
1.29
+81.7%

Xeon E7-8890 v4 outperforms Core 2 Duo E8200 by an impressive 82% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27152285
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Seriesno dataIntel Xeon E7
Power efficiency1.030.74
Architecture codenameWolfdale (2008−2010)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release dateJanuary 2008 (16 years ago)20 June 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$7,174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads248
Base clock speed2.66 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.67 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeno dataQPI
Bus rate1333 MHz3 × 9.6 GT/s
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache6 MB (shared)6 MB
L3 cache0 KB60 MB
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size107 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data79 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistors410 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.85V-1.3625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration18 (Multiprocessor)
SocketLGA775FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switching--
PAEno data46 Bit
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data+
VT-x++
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR1, DDR2, DDR3DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory sizeno data3 TB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidthno data85 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data32

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Core 2 Duo E8200 0.71
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.29
+81.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Core 2 Duo E8200 1124
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054
+82.7%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.71 1.29
Physical cores 2 24
Threads 2 48
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 165 Watt

Core 2 Duo E8200 has 153.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon E7-8890 v4, on the other hand, has a 81.7% higher aggregate performance score, 1100% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon E7-8890 v4 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core 2 Duo E8200 in performance tests.

Note that Core 2 Duo E8200 is a desktop processor while Xeon E7-8890 v4 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Core 2 Duo E8200 and Xeon E7-8890 v4, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Core 2 Duo E8200
Core 2 Duo E8200
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 131 vote

Rate Core 2 Duo E8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 28 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Core 2 Duo E8200 or Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.