Opteron X2 275 vs Ryzen 5 1300

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Italy (2005−2006)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)May 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threadsno data2
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz2.2 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8192 KB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm90 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4800 million233 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM4940
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt95 Watt

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 5 1300 has 100% more physical cores, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Ryzen 5 1300 is a desktop processor while Opteron X2 275 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 5 1300 and Opteron X2 275, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 5 1300
Ryzen 5 1300
AMD Opteron X2 275
Opteron X2 275

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 13 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron X2 275 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1300 or Opteron X2 275, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.