Xeon E3-1260L vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Aggregated performance score
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1260L by an impressive 62% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1274 | 1619 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 12.42 | 0.33 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2020) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) | 3 April 2011 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $150 |
| Current price | $154 | $466 (3.1x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE has 3664% better value for money than Xeon E3-1260L.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.3 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 3.3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | 216 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 59 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 95 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4,940 million | 1,160 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
| Flex Memory Access | no data | + |
| Demand Based Switching | no data | + |
| FDI | no data | + |
| Fast Memory Access | no data | + |
| Status | no data | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
| EDB | no data | + |
| Identity Protection | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | no data |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
| EPT | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 21 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel HD Graphics 2000 |
| Quick Sync Video | no data | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.25 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 2 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1260L by 62% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1260L by 62% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1260L by 138% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE outperforms Xeon E3-1260L by 107% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.27 | 2.63 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.49 | |
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 3 April 2011 |
| Threads | 4 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 45 Watt |
The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E3-1260L in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is a desktop processor while Xeon E3-1260L is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE and Xeon E3-1260L, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
