Celeron B730 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1309 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Celeron |
| Architecture codename | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 30 September 2019 (4 years ago) | 31 July 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $70 |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | 18 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 64 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 256 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 1.5 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 131 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 504 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Socket AM4 | Socket G2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | no data | + |
| Idle States | no data | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | - | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| EDB | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 30 September 2019 | 31 July 2012 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 35 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G has an age advantage of 7 years, 300% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
Celeron B730, on the other hand, has 85.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while Celeron B730 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and Celeron B730, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
