A4-4300M vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.52
+595%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms A4-4300M by a whopping 595% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking12542659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.54no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD A-Series
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2020)Trinity (2012−2013)
Release date30 September 2019 (4 years ago)15 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Current price$132 $61

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache384 KB96 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (shared)
L3 cache4 MB0 KB
Chip lithography12 nm32 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Number of transistors4940 Million1,303 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FS1r2
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno data86x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX, FMA
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933unknown
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)AMD Radeon HD 7420G

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 4.52
+595%
A4-4300M 0.65

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms A4-4300M by 595% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G 6991
+599%
A4-4300M 1000

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G outperforms A4-4300M by 599% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.52 0.65
Integrated graphics card 4.50 0.80
Recency 30 September 2019 15 May 2012
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 12 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the A4-4300M in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is a desktop processor while A4-4300M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G and A4-4300M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
AMD A4-4300M
A4-4300M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 131 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 108 votes

Rate A4-4300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G or A4-4300M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.