A9-9425 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.51
+105%
A9-9425
2016
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
1.71

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U outperforms A9-9425 by a whopping 105% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15952115
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Bristol Ridge
Power efficiency22.3910.91
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)Stoney Ridge (2016−2019)
Release date8 January 2019 (6 years ago)31 May 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier20no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)128K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm28 nm
Die size210 mm2124.5 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data74 °C
Number of transistors4,950 million1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5FT4
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, TBM, FMA4, XOP, SMEP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1100 MHz)AMD Radeon R5 (Stoney Ridge) ( - 900 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 3.51
+105%
A9-9425 1.71

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U 5630
+269%
A9-9425 1526

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 1.71
Integrated graphics card 2.83 1.34
Recency 8 January 2019 31 May 2016
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm

Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U has a 105.3% higher aggregate performance score, 111.2% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 2 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD A9-9425 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U
AMD A9-9425
A9-9425

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 121 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1551 vote

Rate A9-9425 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 PRO 2300U and A9-9425, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.