Ryzen 3 3250U vs Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
2018
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.18
+76.4%
Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.37

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking14311840
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency6.1215.05
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date10 May 2018 (6 years ago)6 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speedno data2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplier3526
L1 cache384 KB192 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Number of transistors4950 Million4500 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket AM4FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB32 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/s38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) and RX Vega 3
AMD Radeon Vega 8AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1212

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 4.18
+76.4%
Ryzen 3 3250U 2.37

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G 6704
+76.6%
Ryzen 3 3250U 3797

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.18 2.37
Integrated graphics card 3.88 2.57
Recency 10 May 2018 6 January 2020
Physical cores 4 2
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G has a 76.4% higher aggregate performance score, 51% faster integrated GPU, and 100% more physical cores.

Ryzen 3 3250U, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 93 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 2224 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 PRO 2200G and Ryzen 3 3250U, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.