Athlon II Neo K325 vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1364not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.37no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Athlon II Neo
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Geneva (2010)
Release date29 June 2017 (7 years ago)12 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Current price$119 $26

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed3.1 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.3 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/s2000 MHz
L1 cache96K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache8 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size192 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,800 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierYesNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketAM4S1
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt12 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataDDR3 memory controller, SSE4A, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization, PowerNow, HyperTransport 3.0
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data
PowerNowno data+
VirusProtectno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes20no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 6131
+1370%
Athlon II Neo K325 417

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 1370% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 811
+413%
Athlon II Neo K325 158

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 413% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 2493
+769%
Athlon II Neo K325 287

Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 outperforms Athlon II Neo K325 by 769% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2017 12 May 2010
Physical cores 4 2
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 12 Watt

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon II Neo K325 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon II Neo K325, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
AMD Athlon II Neo K325
Athlon II Neo K325

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 64 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 9 votes

Rate Athlon II Neo K325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 or Athlon II Neo K325, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.