Athlon 64 2850e vs Ryzen 3 PRO 1200
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1446 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 5.63 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Zen (2017−2020) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 29 June 2017 (7 years ago) | August 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 3.1 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 31 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96K (per core) | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512K (per core) | 512K |
| L3 cache | 8 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 192 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,800 million | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 22 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR2 |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 42.671 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 4 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 22 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon 64 2850e, on the other hand, has 195.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 is a server/workstation processor while Athlon 64 2850e is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 PRO 1200 and Athlon 64 2850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
