Core i7 vs Ryzen 3 7320C
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 7320C outperforms Core i7 by a whopping 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 7320C and Core i7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1081 | 1680 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 5.50 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | no data |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino (Zen 2) | no data |
| Release date | 20 September 2022 (1 year ago) | 1 October 2023 (less than a year ago) |
| Current price | no data | $269 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 7320C and Core i7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | no data |
| Threads | 8 | no data |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4.1 GHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | no data |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | no data |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 7320C and Core i7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | no data |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 7320C and Core i7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon 610M | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Ryzen 3 7320C outperforms Core i7 by 126% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Ryzen 3 7320C outperforms Core i7 by 13% in Passmark.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 5.57 | 2.46 |
| Recency | 20 September 2022 | 1 October 2023 |
The Ryzen 3 7320C is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7 in performance tests.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 7320C is a notebook processor while Core i7 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 7320C and Core i7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
