Xeon E5-2620 vs Ryzen 3 4300U

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 4300U
2020
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
4.86
+40.5%

Ryzen 3 4300U outperforms Xeon E5-2620 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking12691569
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data1.73
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Renoir (Ryzen 4000 APU)no data
Power efficiency17.733.32
Architecture codenameRenoir-U (Zen 2) (2020−2021)Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 March 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$36

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus rateno data7.2 GT/s
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)256 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)15360 KB (shared)
Chip lithography7 nm32 nm
Die size156 mm2435 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °C77 °C
Number of transistors9800 Million2,270 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP6FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® AVX
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data1.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR3
Maximum memory size64 GB384 GB
Max memory channelsno data4
Maximum memory bandwidth68.27 GB/s42.6 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data40

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 4300U 4.86
+40.5%
Xeon E5-2620 3.46

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 4300U 7431
+40.4%
Xeon E5-2620 5291

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 4300U 1268
+214%
Xeon E5-2620 404

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 4300U 3397
+73.7%
Xeon E5-2620 1956

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.86 3.46
Recency 6 January 2020 6 March 2012
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 7 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 95 Watt

Ryzen 3 4300U has a 40.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 357.1% more advanced lithography process, and 533.3% lower power consumption.

Xeon E5-2620, on the other hand, has 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

The Ryzen 3 4300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5-2620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 4300U is a notebook processor while Xeon E5-2620 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 4300U and Xeon E5-2620, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 4300U
Ryzen 3 4300U
Intel Xeon E5-2620
Xeon E5-2620

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 953 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 4300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 515 votes

Rate Xeon E5-2620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 4300U or Xeon E5-2620, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.