i5-9300H vs Ryzen 3 3300U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.57
Core i5-9300H
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 45 Watt
4.76
+33.3%

Core i5-9300H outperforms Ryzen 3 3300U by a substantial 33% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking15241264
Place by popularitynot in top-10065
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Core i5
Power efficiency22.5210.01
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$250

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2124
L1 cache384 KB256 KB
L2 cache2 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)8 MB
Chip lithography12 nm14 nm
Die size209.78 mm2149 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFP5FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
My WiFino data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size64 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s45.741 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000) ( - 1200 MHz)Intel UHD Graphics 630
Max video memoryno data64 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.05 GHz
InTru 3Dno data+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096 x 2304@60Hz
Max resolution over VGAno dataN/A

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes1216

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3300U 3.57
i5-9300H 4.76
+33.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3300U 5673
i5-9300H 7556
+33.2%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Ryzen 3 3300U 4280
i5-9300H 6572
+53.6%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Ryzen 3 3300U 12357
i5-9300H 24623
+99.3%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Ryzen 3 3300U 4332
i5-9300H 8107
+87.1%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Ryzen 3 3300U 471
i5-9300H 790
+67.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Ryzen 3 3300U 134
i5-9300H 172
+28.4%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Ryzen 3 3300U 2.7
i5-9300H 4.7
+74.1%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Ryzen 3 3300U 2398
i5-9300H 5663
+136%

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Ryzen 3 3300U 26
i5-9300H 49
+88.5%

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Ryzen 3 3300U 132
i5-9300H 194
+46.6%

Blender(-)

Ryzen 3 3300U 1212
+101%
i5-9300H 602

7-Zip Single

Ryzen 3 3300U 3340
i5-9300H 4609
+38%

7-Zip

Ryzen 3 3300U 12118
i5-9300H 22133
+82.6%

WebXPRT 3

Ryzen 3 3300U 154
i5-9300H 222
+44.6%

Geekbench 3 32-bit multi-core

Ryzen 3 3300U 10170
i5-9300H 15528
+52.7%

Geekbench 3 32-bit single-core

Ryzen 3 3300U 3469
i5-9300H 3855
+11.1%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Ryzen 3 3300U 10223
i5-9300H 16911
+65.4%

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Ryzen 3 3300U 3672
i5-9300H 5266
+43.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.57 4.76
Integrated graphics card 3.04 3.09
Recency 6 January 2019 23 April 2019
Threads 4 8
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 45 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300U has a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

i5-9300H, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher aggregate performance score, 1.6% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 months, and 100% more threads.

The Core i5-9300H is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3300U in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3300U and Core i5-9300H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U
Intel Core i5-9300H
Core i5-9300H

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 217 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2589 votes

Rate Core i5-9300H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3300U or Core i5-9300H, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.