Xeon Gold 6354 vs Ryzen 3 3250U

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3250U
2020
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.40
Xeon Gold 6354
2021
18 cores / 36 threads, 205 Watt
26.09
+987%

Xeon Gold 6354 outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U by a whopping 987% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1771186
Place by popularity81not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Power efficiency15.1412.04
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date6 January 2020 (4 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads436
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Multiplier26no data
L1 cache192 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)39 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size246 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data77 °C
Number of transistors4500 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFP5FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Precision Boost 2+no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size32 GB6 TB
Max memory channels28
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1200 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1264

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3250U 2.40
Xeon Gold 6354 26.09
+987%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3250U 3808
Xeon Gold 6354 41445
+988%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.40 26.09
Recency 6 January 2020 6 April 2021
Physical cores 2 18
Threads 4 36
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 205 Watt

Ryzen 3 3250U has 1266.7% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6354, on the other hand, has a 987.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 800% more physical cores and 800% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6354 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3250U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3250U is a notebook processor while Xeon Gold 6354 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3250U and Xeon Gold 6354, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
Ryzen 3 3250U
Intel Xeon Gold 6354
Xeon Gold 6354

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2125 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3250U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6354 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3250U or Xeon Gold 6354, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.