EPYC 73F3 vs Ryzen 3 3200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200U
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.46
EPYC 73F3
2021
16 cores / 32 threads, 240 Watt
29.81
+1112%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by a whopping 1112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1679132
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.25
Market segmentLaptopServer
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD EPYC
Architecture codenamePicasso-U (Zen)Milan (2021)
Release date6 January 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,521
Current price$488 $2280 (0.6x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed2.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz4 GHz
L1 cache128K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nm7 nm+
Die size246 mm28x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature105 °Cno data
Number of transistors4500 Million33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFP5SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt240 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-2400 RAM, PCIe 3, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEno data
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size64 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3N/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes12128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200U 2.46
EPYC 73F3 29.81
+1112%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 1112% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 3200U 3806
EPYC 73F3 46103
+1111%

EPYC 73F3 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200U by 1111% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.46 29.81
Recency 6 January 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 240 Watt

The EPYC 73F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200U in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 3200U is a notebook processor while EPYC 73F3 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200U and EPYC 73F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
Ryzen 3 3200U
AMD EPYC 73F3
EPYC 73F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1412 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 73F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200U or EPYC 73F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.