i7-2655LE vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms i7-2655LE by a whopping 255% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 1287 | 2260 |
| Place by popularity | 31 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.90 | 0.03 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | Picasso (2019−2022) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| Release date | 12 June 2019 (5 years ago) | no data |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99 | $346 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Ryzen 3 3200G has 29567% better value for money than i7-2655LE.
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 3.6 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 4 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Bus type | PCIe 3.0 | DMI 2.0 |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 36 | 22 |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 4 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 4940 Million | 624 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | AM4 | no data |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 64 GB | 16 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 46.933 GB/s | 21.335 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Intel HD Graphics 3000 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 4.62 | 1.30 |
| Integrated graphics card | 4.50 | 0.66 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 2 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 25 Watt |
Ryzen 3 3200G has a 255.4% higher aggregate performance score, 581.8% faster integrated GPU, 100% more physical cores, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.
i7-2655LE, on the other hand, has 160% lower power consumption.
The Ryzen 3 3200G is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-2655LE in performance tests.
Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Core i7-2655LE is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Core i7-2655LE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
