Ultra 5 134U vs Ryzen 3 3200G

VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3200G
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
4.66
Core Ultra 5 134U
2023
12 cores / 14 threads, 9 Watt
7.88
+69.1%

Core Ultra 5 134U outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G by an impressive 69% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1309957
Place by popularity29not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.90no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Meteor Lake-U
Power efficiency6.5479.84
Architecture codenamePicasso (2019−2022)Meteor Lake-U (2023)
Release date12 June 2019 (5 years ago)14 December 2023 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99$332

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads414
Base clock speed3.6 GHz0.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4 GHz4.4 GHz
Bus typePCIe 3.0no data
Multiplier36no data
L1 cache384 KB112 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography12 nmIntel 4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data110 °C
Number of transistors4940 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FCBGA2551
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt9 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vProno data+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
TSX-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
Deep Learning Boost-+
Supported AI Software Frameworks-OpenVINO™, WindowsML, ONNX RT

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GB64 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth46.933 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)Intel® Graphics
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.75 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL)
Max resolution over eDPno data3840x2400 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12.2
OpenGLno data4.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes208
PCI supportno data4.0 and 3.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3200G 4.66
Ultra 5 134U 7.88
+69.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 3200G 7129
Ultra 5 134U 12058
+69.1%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 3200G 1075
Ultra 5 134U 1985
+84.7%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 3200G 3063
Ultra 5 134U 8010
+162%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 4.66 7.88
Recency 12 June 2019 14 December 2023
Physical cores 4 12
Threads 4 14
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 9 Watt

Ultra 5 134U has a 69.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 200% more physical cores and 250% more threads, and 622.2% lower power consumption.

The Core Ultra 5 134U is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3200G in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3200G is a desktop processor while Core Ultra 5 134U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Core Ultra 5 134U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
Ryzen 3 3200G
Intel Core Ultra 5 134U
Core Ultra 5 134U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3087 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3200G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Core Ultra 5 134U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3200G or Core Ultra 5 134U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.