Celeron 900 vs Ryzen 3 3200G

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	1310	not rated
Place by popularity	29	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.90	no data
Market segment	Desktop processor	Laptop
Series	AMD Ryzen 3	no data
Power efficiency	6.54	no data
Architecture codename	Picasso (2019−2022)	no data
Release date	12 June 2019 (5 years ago)	1 January 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	4 (Quad-Core)	no data
Threads	4	no data
Base clock speed	3.6 GHz	2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed	4 GHz	no data
Bus type	PCIe 3.0	no data
Multiplier	36	no data
L1 cache	384 KB	no data
L2 cache	2 MB	no data
L3 cache	4 MB (shared)	1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography	12 nm	45 nm
Die size	209.78 mm2	no data
Maximum core temperature	no data	105 °C
Number of transistors	4940 Million	no data
64 bit support	+	+
Windows 11 compatibility	+	-
Unlocked multiplier	+	-

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration	1 (Uniprocessor)	no data
Socket	AM4	PGA478
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI	+	-
AVX	+	-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	no data	-
Turbo Boost Technology	no data	-
Hyper-Threading Technology	no data	-

Security technologies

Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	no data	-
EDB	no data	+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V	+	-
VT-x	no data	-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory types	DDR4 Dual-channel	no data
Maximum memory size	64 GB	no data
Max memory channels	2	no data
Maximum memory bandwidth	46.933 GB/s	no data
ECC memory support	+	-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900.

PCIe version	3.0	no data
PCI Express lanes	20	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.

---

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	12 June 2019	1 January 2009
Chip lithography	12 nm	45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	65 Watt	35 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3200G and Celeron 900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---