Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX vs Ryzen 3 3100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 3100
2020
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
7.71
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
2020
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
40.73
+428%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by a whopping 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking89255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation31.7818.30
Market segmentDesktop processorWorkstation
SeriesMatisse (Ryzen 3000 Desktop)AMD Ryzen Threadripper
Architecture codenameMatisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date7 May 2020 (4 years ago)14 July 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$99no data
Current price$84 (0.8x MSRP)$2200

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 3 3100 has 74% better value for money than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads864
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz4.2 GHz
L1 cache256 KB2 MB
L2 cache2 MB16 MB
L3 cache16 MB128 MB
Chip lithography7 nm7 nm
Die size74 mm274 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)95 °C95 °C
Number of transistors3,800 million3800 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierYesYes

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM4 (LGA1331)sWRX8
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsDDR4-3200 RAM, PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SMEMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AES, AVX, AVX2, BMI1, BMI2, SHA, F16C, FMA3, AMD64, EVP, AMD-V, SMAP, SMEP, SMT, Precision Boost 2, XFR 2
AES-NI++
FMA+no data
AVX++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data2 TiB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data204.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX.

PCIe version4.04.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 3100 7.71
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 40.73
+428%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 428% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 3 3100 11928
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 62990
+428%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 428% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 3100 1485
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 1647
+10.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 11% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Ryzen 3 3100 5103
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 14510
+184%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 184% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 3 3100 5181
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 5884
+13.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 14% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 3 3100 23406
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 53924
+130%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 130% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Ryzen 3 3100 6.58
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 3.63
+81.3%

Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX by 81% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 3 3100 11
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 52
+378%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 378% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 3100 991
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 7053
+612%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 612% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 3 3100 178
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 201
+12.9%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 13% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 3 3100 1.99
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 2.19
+10.1%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 10% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 5.4
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 27
+400%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 400% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 4848
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 6530
+34.7%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 35% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 59
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 193
+229%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 229% in x264 encoding pass 2.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 3 3100 203
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX 268
+32.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX outperforms Ryzen 3 3100 by 32% in x264 encoding pass 1.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.71 40.73
Recency 7 May 2020 14 July 2020
Physical cores 4 32
Threads 8 64
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 280 Watt

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is our recommended choice as it beats the Ryzen 3 3100 in performance tests.

Note that Ryzen 3 3100 is a desktop processor while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 3100 and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 3100
Ryzen 3 3100
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 1570 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 88 votes

Rate Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 3100 or Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.