i5-13400E vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Primary details
Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1816 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop processor |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 14.24 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 8 January 2018 (6 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 2.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.5 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 192 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | 20 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 209.78 mm2 | 257 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 4950 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FP5 | 1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Security technologies
Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 | Intel UHD Graphics 730 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.98 | 4.15 |
| Recency | 8 January 2018 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 10 |
| Threads | 4 | 16 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 65 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2200U has 333.3% lower power consumption.
i5-13400E, on the other hand, has 39.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 4 years, 400% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook processor while Core i5-13400E is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and Core i5-13400E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
