Celeron 6205 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking1721not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3Intel Tiger Lake
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Tiger Lake U (2020)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)1 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Current price$549 no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed2.5 GHzno data
L1 cache192 KB160 KB
L2 cache1 MB2.5 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5BGA1499
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+no data
AVX+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR4
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon RX Vega 3Intel UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Pros & cons summary


Integrated graphics card 2.98 4.55
Recency 8 January 2018 1 September 2020
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm

We couldn't decide between Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and Celeron 6205, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
Intel Celeron 6205
Celeron 6205

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 521 vote

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Celeron 6205 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U or Celeron 6205, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.