Athlon II X2 260 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Ryzen 3 2200U
2018
2 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
2.35
+205%

Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms Athlon II X2 260 by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17962634
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data3.72
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3no data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2018)Regor (2009−2013)
Release date8 January 2018 (6 years ago)11 May 2010 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$48

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads42
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache192 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)0 KB
Chip lithography14 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm2117 mm2
Number of transistors4950 Million410 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFP5AM3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR3
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes12no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 3 2200U 2.35
+205%
Athlon II X2 260 0.77

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Ryzen 3 2200U 3583
+204%
Athlon II X2 260 1178

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Ryzen 3 2200U 791
+127%
Athlon II X2 260 349

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Ryzen 3 2200U 1596
+155%
Athlon II X2 260 626

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.35 0.77
Recency 8 January 2018 11 May 2010
Threads 4 2
Chip lithography 14 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200U has a 205.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 2200U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 260 in performance tests.

Be aware that Ryzen 3 2200U is a notebook processor while Athlon II X2 260 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon II X2 260, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
AMD Athlon II X2 260
Athlon II X2 260

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 528 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 127 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 3 2200U or Athlon II X2 260, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.