Athlon 64 TF-20 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Aggregate performance score
Ryzen 3 2200U outperforms Athlon 64 TF-20 by a whopping 1253% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2100 | 3577 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Ryzen 3 | AMD Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 14.54 | no data |
| Designer | AMD | AMD |
| Manufacturer | GlobalFoundries | no data |
| Architecture codename | Raven Ridge (2017−2019) | Sherman (2009) |
| Release date | 8 January 2018 (7 years ago) | 1 May 2009 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Base clock speed | 2.5 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 3.4 GHz | 1.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 667 MHz |
| Multiplier | 25 | no data |
| L1 cache | 96 KB (per core) | 0.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 210 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | 4,950 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | no data |
| Socket | FP5 | S1g1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 512 KB |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection |
| AES-NI | + | - |
| AVX | + | - |
| VirusProtect | - | + |
| Precision Boost 2 | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | no data |
| Maximum memory size | 32 GB | no data |
| Max memory channels | 2 | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 38.397 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | AMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 TF-20.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | no data |
| PCI Express lanes | 12 | no data |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core
Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.
3DMark06 CPU
3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.03 | 0.15 |
| Recency | 8 January 2018 | 1 May 2009 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 4 | 1 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 512 Watt |
Ryzen 3 2200U has a 1253.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 3313.3% lower power consumption.
The AMD Ryzen 3 2200U is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Athlon 64 TF-20 in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
