Athlon 64 L110 vs Ryzen 3 2200U

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2098not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Ryzen 3AMD Athlon 64
Power efficiency14.51no data
DesignerAMDAMD
ManufacturerGlobalFoundriesno data
Architecture codenameRaven Ridge (2017−2019)no data
Release date8 January 2018 (7 years ago)24 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads41
Base clock speed2.5 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rateno data800 MHz
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache96 KB (per core)no data
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache4 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nmno data
Die size210 mm2no data
Number of transistors4,950 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFP5no data
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt512 KB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMTno data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
Precision Boost 2+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelno data
Maximum memory size32 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth38.397 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 1000 MHz)no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes12no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 January 2018 24 June 2009
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 4 1
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 512 Watt

Ryzen 3 2200U has an age advantage of 8 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and 3313.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AMD Ryzen 3 2200U and AMD Athlon 64 L110. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Ryzen 3 2200U
Ryzen 3 2200U
AMD Athlon 64 L110
Athlon 64 L110

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 562 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 2200U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate Athlon 64 L110 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Ryzen 3 2200U and Athlon 64 L110, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.